Measures that reduce energy consumption also benefit public health, employment, energy security, and more, says final IPCC climate report.
Despite current renewable energy use, we’re not doing enough to stave off dangerous levels of warming. Mitigation, a human intervention to reduce sources of greenhouse gases and to speed up their removal from the atmosphere, is required to keep our world livable. The third chapter of the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report evaluates social implications of different mitigation options. You can find our summaries of their first chapters here: one and two.
Mitigation projects, like those summarized below, can benefit society while reducing climate-warming pollution. As the report emphasizes, many mitigation tactics also have an environmental justice angle: “limiting the effects of climate change is necessary to achieve sustainable development and equity, including poverty eradication.”
- Increased heating efficiency by retrofitting buildings saves homeowners money on their heating and cooling bills and creates more comfortable spaces to live and work.
- More reliable transit would help those already dependent on mass transportation like buses and trains to reach school and work, while encouraging others to use transit instead of relying on personal cars. Additionally, investing “in public transport systems and low-carbon infrastructure can avoid lock-in to carbon-intensive modes” over the long term, like building a light-rail system rather than a new highway.
- Maintaining forests and soils in their natural state allows for significant amounts of carbon uptake, and reductions in carbon release. Co-benefits include wildlife habitat and cleaner drinking water.
There’s almost universal consensus that it’s going to be expensive to mitigate climate change—but it will be even more expensive not to do so, and not only for the economy. Humans, the economy, and the environment will all benefit if massive mitigation strategies are undertaken sooner rather than later. The IPCC report says that climate policy intersects with other societal goals:
“These intersections, if well managed, can strengthen the basis for undertaking climate action. Mitigation and adaptation can positively or negatively influence the achievement of other societal goals, such as those related to human health, food security, biodiversity, local environmental quality, energy access, livelihoods, and equitable sustainable development […] This multi-objective perspective is important in part because it helps to identify areas where support for policies that advance multiple goals will be robust.”
The next big chance for global consensus to act on climate change will be in Paris in 2015, at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or COP21 for short.
Posted by Sarah Ganong, Media Coordinator for CFE & Save the Sound.